The Rent Hacker Subscribe free →

Calculator

House-Hack vs. Rent + S&P 500.

House hacking = buying a 2–4 unit property, living in one unit, and renting the others to cover most or all of your mortgage.

Same engine the newsletter runs on every Bay Area listing. Drag a slider. Net worth, cash flow, ROI, and S&P breakeven update on the spot.

Want a worked example? Read the writeup of the Maryland townhouse I almost bought, then download the JSON and Import it below to see the same numbers.

Start withPick a real Bay Area listing or start from defaults. Then move whatever sliders matter to you.
After 10 years, the winner isRent + S&P 500
margin $202,250 (14.7% edge)
S&P could fall to 7.7% and still win
Is the juice worth the squeeze?Hybrid (2yr hack / 8yr rental) · thresholds 9.0% / 23.0% / 46.0%
Edge over House-Hack14.7%$202,250 total
Wealth multiplier9.2× · 10.5×10yr terminal ÷ starting capital
VerdictLeaning9.0–23.0% edge — real advantage, not overwhelming
Shared assumptionsInputs used by both scenarios
Personal Finance
Starting Capital
Monthly Take-Home
Groceries + Gas / Wk
Mortgage Terms (Property 1)
Down Payment %
Mortgage Rate
Property Tax
Property Tax Growth / Yr
Home Insurance %
PMI Rate (if <20% down)
Buy Closing Costs
Property Costs
Property Utilities / Mo
HOA / Mo (Property 1)
Maint. & Vacancy
Emergency Coverage (Months)
Cost to Sell
Market & Timing
General Inflation
Investment Return
House-Hack Years
Projection Years
After You Move Out
Rent After Move-Out
Rent Growth
Personal Utilities / Mo
Renter's Insurance / Mo
A · House-HackThe property you'd buy
Home Price
Number of Units
Rental Income / Mo (hack phase)
Full Rent / Mo (post move-out)
Upfront Repairs
Appreciation
Rent Growth
Marginal Tax Rate (opt-in)

0 = tax model OFF (conservative). Set to your federal bracket (10/12/22/24/32/35/37) to estimate rental deductions — see disclaimers below for what this does and doesn't model.

Land Value % of Price
B · Rent + S&P 500Rent forever, invest the difference
Monthly Rent
Rent Inflation / Yr
Renter's Insurance / Mo
Utilities / Mo
  • All $150,000 invested in S&P on day 1
  • No property tax, no maintenance, no selling costs
  • Rent inflates at 3%/yr (vs fixed mortgage)
Total wealth over time
House-HackS&P
$0$341k$682k$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M012345678910

No crossover — Rent + S&P 500 leads the entire 10-year horizon

House-hack breakdown
Net equityPortfolio
$0$293k$587k$880k$1.2M$1.5M012345678910

Year 10: $658k equity + $701k portfolio = $1.4M total

MetricA · $1,100,000B · Rent + S&P 500
Upfront Capital Allocation
Cash to Close
$113,000
$0
Buy Closing Costs
$33,000
$0
Emergency Fund (set aside)
$18,951
$0
Leftover Capital → Invested Day 1
$18,049
$150,000
Monthly Picture (Year 1)
Mortgage PITI
$8,497
HOA Fees
$0
$0
Rent Paid
$3,000
Effective Rental Income
$2,816
Housing % of Take-Home
74.0%
36.1%
Net Housing Cost
$6,660
$3,275
Total Monthly Expenses
$7,093
$3,708
Monthly Surplus → Invest
$1,907
$5,292
10-Year Outcome
Home Value (Property 1)
$1,551,659
Remaining Mortgage (Property 1)
$894,085
Principal Paid (equity earned)
$150,915
Appreciation Gain
$451,659
Hold Equity (Property 1)
$657,574
$0
Cost to Sell (6%)
-$93,100
$0
Liquidation Equity (Property 1)
$564,474
$0
Total Rent Collected
$706,177
Total Rent Paid
$0
-$412,700
Investment Portfolio
$700,746
$1,579,521
Hold Net Worth
$1,377,271
$1,579,521
Liquidation Net Worth
$1,284,171
$1,579,521
ROI
Total Gain
$1,227,271
$1,429,521
Total ROI %
818.2%
953.0%
Money-weighted IRR (10yr)
13.3%
10.0%
Wealth Multiple
9.18x
10.53x
Winner$1,377,271$1,579,521
Why this result

Leverage vs. liquidity. The house-hacker controls a $1,100,000 asset with $113,000 down. The renter invests the full $150,000 at 10% with zero leverage. At 3.5% appreciation, that's roughly 20x leverage on the buy side.

The renter's hidden cost: inflation. Rent inflates at 3%/yr. The mortgage P&I is fixed forever. Over 10 years, the renter's housing cost rises from $3,000 to $4,032/mo, while the homeowner's P&I never changes. That widening gap compounds.

Hold vs. liquidation. We compare hold equity, not liquidation. Most house-hackers don't sell at year 10. If you did sell everything, 6% selling costs would reduce property equity by $93,100, bringing net worth to $1,284,171.

Why the IRR row disagrees with the verdict. Scroll into the breakdown table and you'll see Rent + S&P 500 wins on dollars but shows a lower Money-weighted IRR (10.0%) than the losing path (13.3%). That's not a bug. It's two different questions. The wealth multiplier above answers who ends up with more money. The IRR answers whose dollars grew faster on a per-dollar basis. They can disagree when the two paths deploy different total amounts of capital: positive rental cashflow on the house-hack side gets counted as a fresh contribution in the IRR formula, which dilutes the per-dollar rate even when terminal wealth is higher. Both numbers are correct; trust the wealth multiplier for "am I richer?" and the IRR for "is my capital working efficiently?"

Stress test. Set rental income to $0, appreciation to 2%, investment return to 10%. If the S&P still wins, you're betting on tenants. If the house-hack still wins, the leverage is doing real work.

What flips the answer?

The house-hack would win if rental income exceeds roughly $4,258/mo, or if appreciation exceeds 5.3%. At current assumptions, the market's 10% compounding on $150,000 day-1 capital beats leveraged real estate.