Calculator
House-Hack vs. Rent + S&P 500.
House hacking = buying a 2–4 unit property, living in one unit, and renting the others to cover most or all of your mortgage.
Same engine the newsletter runs on every Bay Area listing. Drag a slider. Net worth, cash flow, ROI, and S&P breakeven update on the spot.
Want a worked example? Read the writeup of the Maryland townhouse I almost bought, then download the JSON and Import it below to see the same numbers.
- All $150,000 invested in S&P on day 1
- No property tax, no maintenance, no selling costs
- Rent inflates at 3%/yr (vs fixed mortgage)
No crossover — Rent + S&P 500 leads the entire 10-year horizon
Year 10: $658k equity + $701k portfolio = $1.4M total
Leverage vs. liquidity. The house-hacker controls a $1,100,000 asset with $113,000 down. The renter invests the full $150,000 at 10% with zero leverage. At 3.5% appreciation, that's roughly 20x leverage on the buy side.
The renter's hidden cost: inflation. Rent inflates at 3%/yr. The mortgage P&I is fixed forever. Over 10 years, the renter's housing cost rises from $3,000 to $4,032/mo, while the homeowner's P&I never changes. That widening gap compounds.
Hold vs. liquidation. We compare hold equity, not liquidation. Most house-hackers don't sell at year 10. If you did sell everything, 6% selling costs would reduce property equity by $93,100, bringing net worth to $1,284,171.
Why the IRR row disagrees with the verdict. Scroll into the breakdown table and you'll see Rent + S&P 500 wins on dollars but shows a lower Money-weighted IRR (10.0%) than the losing path (13.3%). That's not a bug. It's two different questions. The wealth multiplier above answers who ends up with more money. The IRR answers whose dollars grew faster on a per-dollar basis. They can disagree when the two paths deploy different total amounts of capital: positive rental cashflow on the house-hack side gets counted as a fresh contribution in the IRR formula, which dilutes the per-dollar rate even when terminal wealth is higher. Both numbers are correct; trust the wealth multiplier for "am I richer?" and the IRR for "is my capital working efficiently?"
Stress test. Set rental income to $0, appreciation to 2%, investment return to 10%. If the S&P still wins, you're betting on tenants. If the house-hack still wins, the leverage is doing real work.
The house-hack would win if rental income exceeds roughly $4,258/mo, or if appreciation exceeds 5.3%. At current assumptions, the market's 10% compounding on $150,000 day-1 capital beats leveraged real estate.