The Rent Hacker Subscribe free →

Calculator

House-Hack vs. Rent + S&P 500.

House hacking = buying a 2–4 unit property, living in one unit, and renting the others to cover most or all of your mortgage.

Same engine the newsletter runs on every Bay Area listing. Drag a slider. Net worth, cash flow, ROI, and S&P breakeven update on the spot.

Want a worked example? Read the writeup of the Maryland townhouse I almost bought, then download the JSON and Import it below to see the same numbers.

Get this run on live Bay Area listings weekly — only the few that beat the S&P, cautious case, receipts public.

Start withPick a real Bay Area listing or start from defaults. Then move whatever sliders matter to you.
After 10 years, the winner isRent + S&P 500
margin $202,250 (14.7% edge)
S&P could fall to 7.7% and still win
Is the juice worth the squeeze?Hybrid (2yr hack / 8yr rental) · thresholds 0.6 / 1.7 / 4.5 %/yr
Edge over House-Hack1.4%/yr14.7% total · $202,250
Wealth multiplier9.2× · 10.5×10yr terminal ÷ $150,000 starting capital
VerdictLeaning0.6–1.7%/yr edge — real advantage, not overwhelming
Start here
Your rent if you don't buy

What you'd keep paying each month if you never bought. This number moves the verdict more than any other input on the page. Deals opened from the newsletter prefill it with the market rent for a comparable home.

Shared assumptionsInputs used by both scenarios
Your Cash

Moves both sides equally — changes the dollar totals, not the verdict, until it can’t close the deal.

Mortgage Terms (Property 1)
Down Payment %
Mortgage Rate
Property Tax
Property Tax Growth / Yr
Home Insurance %
PMI Rate (if <20% down)
Buy Closing Costs
Property Costs
Property Utilities / Mo
HOA / Mo (Property 1)
Maint. & Vacancy
Emergency Coverage (Months)
Cost to Sell
Market & Timing
General Inflation
Investment Return
House-Hack Years
Projection Years
After You Move Out
Rent After Move-Out
Rent Growth
Personal Utilities / Mo
Renter's Insurance / Mo
A · House-HackThe property you'd buy
Home Price
Number of Units
Rental Income / Mo (hack phase)
Full Rent / Mo (post move-out)
Upfront Repairs
Appreciation
Rent Growth
Marginal Tax Rate (opt-in)

0 = tax model OFF (conservative). Set to your federal bracket (10/12/22/24/32/35/37) to estimate rental deductions — see disclaimers below for what this does and doesn't model.

Land Value % of Price
B · Rent + S&P 500Rent forever, invest the difference
Rent Inflation / Yr
Renter's Insurance / Mo
Utilities / Mo
  • Pays the $3,000/mo rent set at the top of the page
  • All $150,000 invested in S&P on day 1
  • No property tax, no maintenance, no selling costs
  • Rent inflates at 3%/yr (vs fixed mortgage)
Total wealth over time
House-HackS&P
$0$341k$682k$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M012345678910

No crossover — Rent + S&P 500 leads the entire 10-year horizon

House-hack breakdown
Net equityPortfolio
$0$293k$587k$880k$1.2M$1.5M012345678910

Year 10: $658k equity + $701k portfolio + $19k reserve back = $1.4M total

MetricA · $1,100,000B · Rent + S&P 500
Upfront Capital Allocation
Cash to Close
$113,000
$0
Buy Closing Costs
$33,000
$0
Emergency Fund (set aside)
$18,951
$0
Leftover Capital → Invested Day 1
$18,049
$150,000
Monthly Picture (Year 1)
Mortgage PITI
$8,497
HOA Fees
$0
$0
Rent Paid
$3,000
Effective Rental Income
$2,816
Housing % of Take-Home
74.0%
36.1%
Net Housing Cost
$6,660
$3,275
Total Monthly Expenses
$7,093
$3,708
Monthly Surplus → Invest
$1,907
$5,292
10-Year Outcome
Home Value (Property 1)
$1,551,659
Remaining Mortgage (Property 1)
$894,085
Principal Paid (equity earned)
$150,915
Appreciation Gain
$451,659
Hold Equity (Property 1)
$657,574
$0
Cost to Sell (6%)
-$93,100
$0
Liquidation Equity (Property 1)
$564,474
$0
Total Rent Collected
$706,177
Total Rent Paid
$0
-$412,700
Investment Portfolio
$700,746
$1,579,521
Hold Net Worth
$1,377,271
$1,579,521
Liquidation Net Worth
$1,284,171
$1,579,521
ROI
Total Gain
$1,227,271
$1,429,521
Total ROI %
818.2%
953.0%
Money-weighted IRR (10yr)
13.3%
10.0%
Wealth Multiple
9.18x
10.53x
Winner$1,377,271$1,579,521
Why this result

Leverage vs. liquidity. The house-hacker controls a $1,100,000 asset with $113,000 down. The renter invests the full $150,000 at 10% with zero leverage. At 3.5% appreciation, that's roughly 20x leverage on the buy side.

The renter's hidden cost: inflation. Rent inflates at 3%/yr. The mortgage P&I is fixed forever. Over 10 years, the renter's housing cost rises from $3,000 to $4,032/mo, while the homeowner's P&I never changes. That widening gap compounds.

Hold vs. liquidation. We compare hold equity, not liquidation. Most house-hackers don't sell at year 10. If you did sell everything, 6% selling costs would reduce property equity by $93,100, bringing net worth to $1,284,171.

Why the IRR row disagrees with the verdict. Scroll into the breakdown table and you'll see Rent + S&P 500 wins on dollars but shows a lower Money-weighted IRR (10.0%) than the losing path (13.3%). That's not a bug. It's two different questions. The wealth multiplier above answers who ends up with more money. The IRR answers whose dollars grew faster on a per-dollar basis. They can disagree when the two paths deploy different total amounts of capital: positive rental cashflow on the house-hack side gets counted as a fresh contribution in the IRR formula, which dilutes the per-dollar rate even when terminal wealth is higher. Both numbers are correct; trust the wealth multiplier for "am I richer?" and the IRR for "is my capital working efficiently?"

Stress test. Set rental income to $0, appreciation to 2%, investment return to 10%. If the S&P still wins, you're betting on tenants. If the house-hack still wins, the leverage is doing real work.

What flips the answer?

The house-hack would win if rental income exceeds roughly $4,258/mo, or if appreciation exceeds 5.3%. At current assumptions, the market's 10% compounding on $150,000 day-1 capital beats leveraged real estate.